GEO Scanner Experimental

SEO gets you ranked. AEO gets you read. GEO gets you cited. This scans a page for the signals that make AI answer engines quote it as a source.

What GEO is, and why it's not AEO

Readable vs. quotable

AEO asks whether an answer engine can parse your page — schema, headings, crawler access. GEO asks the harder question: when the engine writes its answer, does it cite you? Being parseable gets you into the candidate set. Being quotable gets you into the answer.

What actually moves the needle

The KDD 2024 GEO study tested content edits against a live generative engine. The changes that raised a source's visibility most were adding statistics, adding quotations, and citing authoritative sources — not keyword tactics.

Statistics beat adjectives

A model writing an answer needs facts it can state and attribute. "Significantly faster" gives it nothing. "38% faster, measured across 1,200 pages" gives it a sentence it can lift, with your page as the citation.

Chunking decides what gets retrieved

Retrieval splits your page into chunks and pulls one at a time. A 1,500-word section under one heading chunks badly — the retrieved fragment has lost the context that made it meaningful. Keep sections to roughly 150–400 words.

JavaScript is the silent killer

GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and CCBot fetch raw HTML and generally don't execute JavaScript. A client-rendered page can be excellent and still be an empty document to them. This is the one failure that voids every other signal.

Name yourself

An engine cites a source it can name. Declare an Organization or Person in JSON-LD with sameAs links to Wikipedia, Wikidata or LinkedIn, so your entity resolves to a known one instead of a guess.